I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-14.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20120208 IETF LC End Date: 20120216 IESG Telechat date: 20120216 Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None (but with proposed changes agreed during the (last) last call applied) Nits/editorial comments: - 1 page 4: the CPE abbrev is not well known so should be introduced (or marked as well known as there are more and more documents in this area) - 4 page 7: my dictionary says the word proscription exists only singular, i.e., proscriptions -> proscription Personal comments: - I am in favor of this document (as explained by some in the IETF ML, other solutions are worse) - I have no illusion about how it will be applied in the real world - this document and many others about CGN/LSN make the dangerous assumption there will be only one level of CGN/LSN - to delay the application of the document (i.e., the allocation of the shared address space) long enough there will be no /10 available should be a very unfair way to (not) solve the problem (:-) Regards francis.dup...@fdupont.fr _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
