On Jul 3, 2012, at 14:24, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> I found it is to be odd to have a requirements document as a BCP, but I am 
> sure
> you can sort the right status out with IESG.

+1

I fail to see why Informational wouldn't be the better status.

Lars

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to