I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-12 Reviewer: Mary Barnes Review Date: 24 Aug 2012 IETF LC End Date: 24 Aug 2012 IESG Telechat Date: 30 Aug 2012 Summary: Ready with nits. Caveat: I have no expertise at all in this technical area, thus I'm assuming that people who are have carefully reviewed. Overall, the document is quite readable. Minor issues: -------------- Section 2: - 3rd para, last sentence is not clear - this phrase in particular doesn't grok: "if you rely on full zone transfers are based I think you are trying to say the following: OLD: It increases even more if you rely on full zone transfers are based on only the SOA timing parameters for refresh. NEW: It increases even more if you rely on the full zone transfers being based only on the SOA timing parameters for refresh. Nits: ---- - Section 3.2.3: i.e they -> i.e., they - Section 4.2.1.1, last sentence: authentic -> authenticate - Section 4.2.1.2, 2nd para, last sentence: possesion -> possession - Section 4.2.4: 1st bullet: curren -> currently - Section 4.3.3: non-existing -> non-existant - Section 4.3.5.2: -- redelegation -> re-delegation (2 places) -- undelegated -> un-delegated (2nd bullet) -- registers -> registrars (3rd bullet) - Section 4.4.1: -- 2nd bullet: minumum - > minimum -- 3rd from last indented bullet: signatures times out - > signatures time out - Section 5.3.3, 1st para, last sentence: precalculated -> pre-calculated
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
