Hi, Roni, Many thanks for the review; I've addressed these points in the -04 revision of the document.
Best regards, Brian On Jul 15, 2012, at 4:00 PM, Roni Even wrote: > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may > receive. > > > Document: draft-ietf-ipfix-ie-doctors-03. > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date:2012–7–15 > IETF LC End Date: 2012–7–17 > IESG Telechat date: > > Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an Informational RFC. > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > 1. The registration procedure should mention NetFlow V9 expert review > for 0-128. I think that in the IANA section it will be good to suggest update > also for the Registration procedure and Reference of the IPFIX Information > Elements registry. > 2. Section 5.1 should reference RFC5226 and say if it clarifies RFC5226 > or adds some procedure. > 3. In section 5.2 is there a need for a specification to explain the > change. The text is not clear about it. > 4. Section 5.3 say “Names of deprecated or obsolete Information > Elements MUST NOT be reused.” What about the elementID can it be re-used? > > > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > 1. Section 4.2 third paragraph “applications can to use reduced-size” > should be “applications can use reduced-size” > 2. Section 4.8 first paragraph “enumerates those which Information > Elements” should be “enumerates those Information Elements” > 3. In section 10.1 “these are described in and Section 10.3” I did not > understand the “in and”, I assume something is missing here. > > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
