Hi Miguel, Thanks for the review.
>- About the SDP example in Section 3.1. The first paragraph reads: > > The SDP description below states that the source flow defined > by the tuple {*,*,233.252.0.1,30000} is identified with FID=0 and the > source flow defined by the tuple {*,*,233.252.0.2,30000} is > identified with FID=1. > > >However, the example shows flows does not show any flow with any token >named "FID". I don't know if the text is trying to refer to the "mid" >attribute, in which case the values are S1 and S2, respectively. Or the >text is trying to refer to the "id" parameter of the "fec-source-flow" >attribute. The text should not leave this interpretation to the reader. It is the id parameter. I added text for this. >- Figure 7 and 8. Do the captions need to indicate that these are "for >IPv4", for example, in Figure 7: "Example of a source packet for IPv4" Good idea. > >- idnits reveals that draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling ha sbeen >published as RFC 6695. Will replace it. -acbegen > >/Miguel >-- >Miguel A. Garcia >+34-91-339-3608 >Ericsson Spain _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art