Hi SM, Please see inline.
Cheers, Med >-----Message d'origine----- >De : SM [mailto:s...@resistor.net] >Envoyé : vendredi 22 mars 2013 03:52 >À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/OLN; Peter Yee >Cc : gen-art@ietf.org; Brian Haberman; Suresh Krishnan; >draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis....@tools.ietf.org >Objet : RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-05 > >Hi Med, >At 02:03 21-03-2013, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: >>I didn't received any explicit answer from your side whether the >>changes in -06 solve your concern. > >Sorry, it was IETF week. > >>I would appreciate if you can check the new revision. For your >>convenience the diff is available here: >>http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal >-analysis-06 > >There was the following in Section 2: > > "HOST_ID does not reveal the identity of a user, a subscriber or an > application." > >That was changed to state that HOST_ID is not designed to reveal the >identity of a user. The question is whether it can be used to reveal >the identity of the user. I don't see an explanation for that in >draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-06. Med: The text in -06 says: HOST_ID is not designed to reveal the identity of a user, a subscriber, or an application. HOST_ID is designed to identify a host under a shared IP address. To prevent HOST_ID to be used to track a host, Section 3 discusses that aspect. In particular, the text says "Address-sharing function should not use permanent HOST_ID values." > >The layering issue for Forwarded header (Section 4.4.1) is still in >draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-06. > >In Section 4.4.2: > > "Injecting Forwarded header also introduces some implementations > complexity if the HTTP message is at or close to the MTU size." > >I don't know how much breakage will occur with this. Med: Me too. This issue was reported by a wg participant. > >I would leave it to the document shepherd to decide whether to >discuss all this in the working group. It could be used to override >the concern if everyone looks the other way. :-) > >Regards, >-sm > > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
