Thank you for the review and updates! I have balloted no-obj for this document.
Jari On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:56 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <c...@it.uc3m.es> wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 09:36 -0700, Martin Thomson wrote: > > (some text skipped) >>> [Authors] We summarize what the document is defining in the >>> Introduction: >>> >>> " This specification defines extensions to the Proxy Mobile IPv6 >>> protocol for allowing mobility support to the mobile networks >>> attached to a mobile router. The mobile router can request the >>> mobility entities in the Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain for one or more >>> delegated IP prefixes using DHCP Prefix Delegation extensions >>> [RFC3633], or through other means such as static configuration, or >>> access technology specific mechanisms." >> >> That's higher level than I was hoping for. This says "extensions" >> without specifying what those extensions are for. It's a small thing, >> but you only need to say that you define an extension parameter for >> carrying prefix information in proxy binding update and proxy binding >> answer messages. > > [Authors] We will add some additional text in -12 to address your > comment. > > [...] > >>>> Expand acronyms. >>> >>> [Authors] Which acronyms are you referring to? in the text or in the >>> figure 2? >> >> The figure. > > [Authors] PBU and PBA will be expanded in the figure in -12. > > Thanks! > > Carlos > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
