Thanks,
I added an RFC editor note.

Adrian

> From: Mike Shand
> Sent: 18 December 2013 14:24:51 (UTC) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Romascanu, Dan (Dan); gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic....@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
> 
> I agree.
> 
>      Mike
> 
> On 17/12/2013 14:52, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
> > Dan -
> >
> > Thanx for the review.
> > I have no objection to your suggestion. I would hope this change can be done
> by the RFC Editor.
> >
> >     Les
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:droma...@avaya.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 5:35 AM
> >> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> >> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic....@tools.ietf.org
> >> Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
> >>
> >>
> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-
> ART,
> >> please see the FAQ at
> >>
> >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> >>
> >> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
> may
> >> receive.
> >>
> >> Document: draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
> >> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> >> Review Date: 12/17/13
> >> IETF LC End Date: 12/24/13
> >> IESG Telechat date:
> >>
> >> Summary: Ready
> >>
> >> Major issues:
> >>
> >> Minor issues:
> >>
> >> It may be more cautious refer to the 'latest available' version of the
IS-IS
> >> standard as we cannot be completely sure that the Second Edition will also
be
> >> the very last one. Suggested change in Section 1:
> >>
> >> OLD:
> >>
> >>     All references to IS-IS should be to ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
> >>     Edition and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.
> >>
> >> NEW:
> >>
> >>     All references to IS-IS should be to the latest edition of the IS-IS
> >>     standard (currently ISO/IEC 10589:2002, Second
> >>     Edition) and RFC 1142 is only of historic interest.
> >>
> >> Nits/editorial comments:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to