On 27 Jan 2014, at 20:59, Barry Leiba <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Actually, I think I convinced Barry that it is updating RFC 2683. > > Yes: because the new line-length-limit recommendation is meant to > apply whether or not condstore or qresync are in play, this "updates" > remains (it's the others that used to be there that we scrubbed). > > I think David's right that some version of what Eliot said: > >> there >> is a requirement for strict syntax parsing. If the client blows it in >> any way, the server SHOULD return an error with a BAD response. > > ...should be added to the section about the line-length limit. A > sentence or two should do nicely. Yes, I agree. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
