Hi Francis, I'll resolve the editorial nits.
Regarding the co-author list, you say (soft) limit, what does (soft) mean here? Does one co-author need to drop of, or will it pass? Thx, Ice. On 17 Feb 2014, at 16:12, Francis Dupont <francis.dup...@fdupont.fr> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-l3vpn-mldp-vrf-in-band-signaling-03.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 20140211 > IETF LC End Date: 20140212 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > - the number of authors is greater than the (soft) limit > > - 1 page 5: too many 'o' in 'co-oordination' > > - 1.2 pages 5 & 6: IMHO you should describe more terms in the Terminology > section, e.g., UMH, RPA and even RD (as VRF is already in it) > > Regards > > francis.dup...@fdupont.fr _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art