Hi - >From: "Sam K. Aldrin" <aldrin.i...@gmail.com> >Sent: Apr 17, 2014 6:24 PM ... >Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-17 ... >My only concern is with the new extension MIB's. >If the base MIB (this MIB) has write access, >future extension MIB's may be forced to support >write-access.
And how, exactly, does the fact that a base MIB module permits write access force extension MIB modules to require (or even permit) write access? It's perfectly reasonable SMI to define an AUGMENTS table consisting entirely of read-only objects. Randy _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
