Thanks for your review, Suresh. Authors, can you take care of the address issue below?
Jari On 29 Oct 2014, at 05:31, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krish...@ericsson.com> wrote: > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd > or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > Document: draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-09.txt > Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan > Review Date: 2013/10/28 > IESG Telechat date: 2013/10/30 > > > Summary: The document is almost ready for publication as Proposed > Standard, but I do have a comment you may wish to consider. > > * Sections 5.2 and 5.3 > > -> The document uses some non-documentation addresses (AFAIK) in some of > the examples. e.g. 28.2.0.0/16 for an IPv4 prefix and 2600::/16 for an > IPv6 prefix. Is it possible to rewrite these examples using reserved > documentation addresses? Strangely enough, idnits does not seem to catch > them either. > > Thanks > Suresh > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
