thanks for your review! authors: was there a response to Ben’s observations?
i have balloted no-obj. jari On 03 Nov 2014, at 22:08, Ben Campbell <b...@nostrum.com> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-mpls-deprecate-bgp-entropy-label-01 > Reviewer: Ben Campbell > Review Date: 2014-11-03 > IETF LC End Date: > IESG Telechat date: (if known) > > Summary: Draft is ready for publication as a proposed standard. I have a few > comments that might be worth considering if there are further updates, but > should not block publication in any way. > > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: > > Am I correct in understanding that this draft deprecates all applicability of > RFC 6790 to BGP, but lets stand its use in all other protocol contexts? If > so, an explicit mention of that might be helpful. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > -- Section 2: > > Is the "subsequent to the publication of this document" disclaimer really > needed? We update protocols all the time without offering date-based > grandfather clauses. > > -- Section 3: > > There's a comma splice at the end of the paragraph. I suggest something to > the effect of "... , _with_ reference _to_ this RFC." > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
