Thank you very much Francis and Carlos.

Jari

On 29 Oct 2014, at 15:52, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <cpign...@cisco.com> 
wrote:

> Many thanks, Francis, for this review! All nits acknowledged and fixed.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Carlos.
> 
>> On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Francis Dupont <francis.dup...@fdupont.fr> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>> 
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>> you may receive.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-03.txt
>> Reviewer: Francis Dupont
>> Review Date: 20141025
>> IETF LC End Date: 20141027
>> IESG Telechat date: unknown
>> 
>> Summary: Ready
>> 
>> Major issues: None
>> 
>> Minor issues: None
>> 
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> - ToC page 2 and 5 page 18: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments
>> 
>> - 3.2.6 page 8: singaling -> signaling
>> 
>> - 3.3.1 page 9: e.g. -> e.g.,
>> 
>> - 3.3.2.4.1 pages 11 and 12: the conclusion (Gap: None) doesn't seem
>> very in phase with the text. Perhaps it is another case of "out of scope
>> known gap"?
>> 
>> - 3.4.2 page 15 (UK vs US spelling): behaviour -> behavior
>> 
>> - 4 page 17: Identifed -> Identified
>> 
>> - 6 pages 18 and 19, Authors' Addresses page 26: I don't like
>> ISO IS 3166 two letter codes used in postal addresses but it seems
>> to be what the new RFC required...
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> francis.dup...@fdupont.fr
>> 
>> PS: I reviewed the 02 version but now the 03 was published so I updated
>> my comments. rfcdiff shows 03 is better than 02 at the exception of:
>> - in 3.3.1.1 page 9 perhaps a missing '<' as I can see:
>>   ... (see xref    
>>   target="LDP"/>).
>> PPS: it could be useful to have a checklist of all RFCs which should
>> be updated but it is more a task for the WG than something to put
>> in the document (I don't follow the WG so I don't know if it already
>> exists :-).
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to