Hi, I am ok either way, as gen-art reviewer it was not clear to me that the server MUST fail the authentication process.
Best Regards, Meral > -----Original Message----- > From: Simo Sorce [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2014 9:30 AM > To: Meral Shirazipour > Cc: Tom Yu; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-00 > > On Sat, 6 Dec 2014 02:27:48 +0000 > Meral Shirazipour <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > RFC 4120 specifies that a server receiving unknown authorization > > > data MUST fail the authentication process. Do you think this needs > > > repeating in this document? > > > > Yes I think it would be good to mentioned it: "As stated in RFC4120, > > ..." > > Hi, I have some reservations on repeating well established concepts from > another document. Should we ever amend the other document we risk the 2 > documents to become inconsistent. > > It is also well-known what AD-IF-RELEVANT do, any implementer must know it > as it has to be properly dealt with in both clients and KDCs, repeating > shouldn't really be necessary. > > Simo. > > -- > Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
