On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:50:53AM +1100, Manger, James wrote:
> >With John Cowan's change ("an ASCII Line Feed character (0x1E)"
> >instead of "an ASCII Record Separator (0x1E)"), that would indeed be
> >clearer.
>
> Please no. That would give an even worse mix of UTF-8 and ASCII, bytes
> and characters, in the 1 sentence.
Well, I just submitted -11 :(
But I don't think it's a problem, really. UTF-8 is a superset of ASCII.
> P.S. The spec still defines the same ABNF names twice (RS,
> JSON-sequence): once as bytes; once as Unicode scalars. Yuck. Just
> give them different names.
They're two different sets of rules, yes. If people want me to, I'll
rename one of them.
Nico
--
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
