Many thanks for the review, Christer. And thanks of the changes, Tiru.

Jari

On 14 Feb 2015, at 00:44, Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Hi,
>  
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
> please see the FAQ at 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
>  
> Document:                         
> draft-ietf-tram-turn-third-party-authz-09.txt
>  
> Reviewer:                           Christer Holmberg
>  
> Review Date:                     13 February 2015
>  
> IETF LC End Date:             4 January 2015
>  
> IETF Telechat Date:         19 February 2015
>  
> Summary:        I see that there has been quite of bit of changes in the 
> draft since the previously reviewed version (-08). However, most of my 
> comments seem to have been addressed. But, I still have a few comments, most 
> related to my comments on the previously reviewed version.              
>  
> Major Issues: None
>  
> Minor Issues: None
>  
> Editorial nits: See below
>  
>  
>  
> -------------
>  
> Section 1:
>  
> Q1_2: Please add an OAuth reference on first occurrence.
>  
> [TR] The latest version 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tram-turn-third-party-authz-11 has 
> OAuth reference on first occurrence in the Introduction section.
>  
> [Christer] True. My mistake. Comment withdrawn :)
>  
> -------------
>  
> Section 4:
>  
>  
> Q4_2:  The section gives examples for the key establishment. I think you 
> should make it clear that, when you say that the mechanism to use is outside 
> the scope of the document, also should say the draft does not mandate any 
> given mechanism.
>  
> [TR] Yes.
>  
> Something like:
>  
>         “The procedure for establishment of the symmetric key is outside the 
> scope of this
>         specification, and this specification does not mandate support of any 
> given mechanism.
>         Sections 4.1.2, 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 show examples of mechanisms that can 
> be used.”
>  
>  
> [TR] Updated draft with the above text.
>  
> Section 4.1.2:
>  
> Q4-1-2_1: Please add a reference to JSON on first occurrence. I see that 
> section 3 no longer mentions JSON.
>  
> [TR] Added
>  
> Q4-1-2_2: I suggest to add a reference to 
> [I-D.ietf-oauth-pop-key-distribution] also in this section, and indicate that 
> it defines the format of the JSON message.
>  
> [TR] oauth-pop-key-distribution is specific to OAuth 2.0 token and keying 
> material distribution from authorization server to the client.
> Added references to json drafts where these parameters are defined
>  
> NEW:
>  
>    k - Long-term key (K)
>    exp - identifies the time after which the key expires.
>  
>  
>    example:
>    {
>       "k" :
>    "ESIzRFVmd4iZABEiM0RVZgKn6WjLaTC1FXAghRMVTzkBGNaaN496523WIISKerLi",
>       "exp" : 1300819380,
>       "kid" :"22BIjxU93h/IgwEb"
>       "enc" : A256CBC-HS512
>      }
>  
>    The parameter "k" is defined in
>    Section 6.4.1 of [I-D.ietf-jose-json-web-algorithms], "enc" is
>    defined in Section 4.1.2 of [I-D.ietf-jose-json-web-encryption],
>    "kid" is defined in Section 4.1.4 of
>    [I-D.ietf-jose-json-web-signature] and "exp" is defined in
>    Section 4.1.4 of [I-D.ietf-oauth-json-web-token].  A256CBC-HS512 and
>    other authenticated encryption algorithms are defined in
>    [I-D.ietf-jose-json-web-algorithms].  In this case AS-RS key length
>    must be 256-bit, AUTH key length must be 256-bit (section 2.6 of
>    [RFC4868]).
>  
> [Christer] Looks good.
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Christer
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to