I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te-09.txt
Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
Review Date: 2015/03/02
IESG Telechat date: 2015/03/05

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard, but I do have some comments you may wish to address.

Minor:

* Section 5

Isn't separating static and dynamic info of the same TE link another method of scaling? (e.g. encoding the Port Label Restrictions sub-TLV into a separate top level link TLV and advertising in a separate LSA)
If so, suggest adding a subsection here to describe it.

* Security Considerations:

I have an uneasy (potentially unjustified) feeling about the lack of any specific security considerations for the Connectivity Matrix sub-TLV. It looks pretty compute intensive to me. Somebody should probably take a look at the DoS possibilities with a multiple complex decomposed Connectivity Matrices.

* IANA Considerations:

Looking at the IANA registry, the Sub-TLVs do not have the text sub-TLV tag attached to them. Suggest renaming to

OLD:
TBD1   |  Connectivity Matrix sub-TLV  |  [This.I-D]

NEW:
TBD1   |  Connectivity Matrix          |  [This.I-D]

OLD:
TBD2   |  Port Label Restrictions sub-TLV  |  [This.I-D]

NEW:
TBD2   |  Port Label Restrictions          |  [This.I-D]

Thanks
Suresh

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to