Thanks for your review, Tom! I assume the authors will work through the nits. I have placed a No-Objection position on the ballot for this document.
Jari On 26 May 2015, at 21:09, Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd > or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > Document: draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe-09 > Reviewer: Tom Taylor > Review Date: 26 May 2015 > IETF LC End Date: > IESG Telechat date: 28 May 2015 > > Summary: Ready with nits. > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > > IDNits complains that RFCs named in the UPDATES header do not get mentioned > in the Abstract. This was noted previously. > > Sec. 3 second paragraph, line 3: s/include/includes/ >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
