Hi Sorry about that. I have looked over the draft looking for acronyms that were not spelled out before use, and I could find only three: AEAD, which is used unexpanded in the Abstract, but expanded before the next use in the Introduction. I thought it was acceptable to avoid expansions in the abstract (although I did expand IKE. The others are “IPsec”, which I think it’s fine to not expand, and “VPN”, which I agree should have been expanded.
Were there any others? Yoav > On Jul 9, 2015, at 1:10 AM, Jari Arkko <jari.ar...@piuha.net> wrote: > > Thanks for the review, Meral! > > (Authors, I assume you have seen the editorial comment below on acronyms; I > don’t see any e-mail related to it.) > > Jari > > On 30 Jun 2015, at 07:10, Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com> > wrote: > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. >> >> >> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you >> may receive. >> >> >> Document: draft-ietf-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305-10 >> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour >> Review Date: 2015-06-29 >> IETF LC End Date: 2015-06-29 >> IESG Telechat date: NA >> >> >> Summary: >> This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC. >> >> >> >> Major issues: >> >> Minor issues: >> >> Nits/editorial comments: >> -Please consider spelling out acronyms at first use. >> >> >> >> Best Regards, >> Meral >> --- >> Meral Shirazipour >> Ericsson >> Research >> www.ericsson.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Gen-art mailing list >> Gen-art@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
