On 7/9/15 2:08 AM, Dushyant Raghuvanshi (draghuva) wrote:
>> - 10 page 26: there is a new security mechanism proposed for DHCPv6, >> secure DHCPv6. As it is clearly designed for UDP transport I don't >> believe it interferes with the document so IMHO you can safely ignore >> it. > > [Dushyant]: Secure DHCPv6 isn’t a standard yet. Can we use that as > reference? > I don't see a reason to reference the sedhcpv6 draft. Regards, Brian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
