Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dh...@huawei.com> writes:
> [[Dhruv Dhody]] I have added this in the backward compatibility session to 
> note this concern - 
>
>    Note that, a PCEP implementation that support PCEPS would respond
>    with PCErr message with Error-Type set to [TBA2 by IANA] (PCEP
>    StartTLS failure) and Error-value set to 2 if any other message is
>    sent before StartTLS or Open.  If the sender of the invalid message
>    is a PCEP implementation that does not support PCEPS, it will not be
>    able to understand this error.  A PCEPS implementation could also
>    send the PCErr message as per [RFC5440] with Error-Type "PCEP session
>    establishment failure" and Error-value "reception of an invalid Open
>    message or a non Open message" before closing the session.

You are, of course, the author.  But my opinion is that you'd get
cleaner compatibility by sending a 1/1 error in this situation.

Dale

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to