Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-05 Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review Date: 2018-02-20 IETF LC End Date: 2018-03-01 IESG Telechat date: 2018-03-08 Summary: A well written document that is difficult to check and easy to make a mistake with. There are a tiny number of editorial matters. The matter of the semantics of Recommended = no may need to further thought and clarification. Major issues: None Minor issues: I think convention is to list the documents being updated in the Abstract, but cannot find any formal guidance. ====== If an item is marked as not recommended it does not necessarily mean SB> Do you mean "marked as not recommended" or "not marked as recommended". ======= SB> I am worried about the semantics of Recommended = no. SB> Presumably there are three states: recommended, not recommended, SB> and silent/don't know/don't care/not yet. Which of these SB> states does Recommended = no represent? Nits/editorial comments: Abstract This document describes a number of changes to (D)TLS IANA registries SB> TLS is not a well known abbreviation and so needs expanding ======== This document instructs IANA to make changes to a number of (D)TLS- SB> TLS needs expanding _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
