Francis, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa
> On Feb 14, 2018, at 7:58 AM, Francis Dupont <francis.dup...@fdupont.fr> wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp-03.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 2018/02/07 > IETF LC End Date: 20180209 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > - Abstract page 1: please expand PE abbrev > > - PoC page 2 and 4 page 7: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments > > - 1 page 3: please introduce PE abbrev (it is not marked as well known > in https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt, and > Abstract and body are independent so an abbrev introduced in the Abstract > should be introduced again in the body). > > - 1 page 3: ECMP is introduced twice (better than none :-). > > - 1 page 3: This draft -> This document (or specification ot ...). > The RFC Editor should update this prior to the publication but > making its job harder is not a good idea. So if you have another > reason to update the document please fix this... > > - 1.1 page 4: RFC 2119 was updated by RFC 8174 > > - 3 page 6: e.g. -> e.g., > > - 3 page 7: i.e. -> i.e., (at end of line) > > Regards > > francis.dup...@fdupont.fr > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
