Hi Robert and everyone else,
Circling for a landing here...
On 11.04.18 18:15, Robert Sparks wrote:
> With this, I'm puzzled about the use of the word standardized at all.
> I think I'm hearing that you expect MUD controllers to know about some
> well-known classes by convention and that groups like fairhair or
> someone else might make a list of classes that MUD controllers might
> collectively decide to build in knowledge of. Am I getting closer to
> the right picture? (This is opposed to a set of classes that are
> created by a standards action and listed in a registry somewhere).
I've attempted to clarify this language as we discussed. On the point
of standardization, I've made a clean separation:
* URNs: standardized (and therefore hopefully well documented)
behaviors, such as DNS and NTP.
* URIs that take the form of URLs. These are just class names that
the administrator has to fill out, or are otherwise somehow
pre-populated.
I hope that this resolves any lingering confusion.
Thanks again for working to improve this document. I really appreciate it!
Eliot
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
