Hi, Christer, On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 1:41 PM Christer Holmberg < christer.holmb...@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Reviewer: Christer Holmberg > Review result: Almost Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-dscp-registry-05 > Reviewer: Christer Holmberg > Review Date: 2018-05-23 > IETF LC End Date: 2018-05-25 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: The document is well written, and almost ready for publication. I > have > one minor editorial comment that I'd like the authors to address. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > > The Abstract says: > > "This update to RFC2474 changes the IANA assignment method..." > > ...and the Introduction says: > > "To allow the IETF to utilise Pool 3 codepoints, this document > requests IANA to to manage Pool 3 assignments for DSCP values in Pool > 3 via the Standards Action policy [RFC8126]. This assignment method > requires publication of a Standards Track or Best Current Practice > RFC." > > I suggest to replace "method" with "policy". > I think that's right. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8126#section-4 does call these "assignment policies". Gorry, if you agree, could you make that change? Thanks, Spencer
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
