Pete, thanks for your reviews. Bron, thanks for addressing Pete’s comments. I 
have entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa

> On Jul 27, 2018, at 1:57 PM, Pete Resnick <presn...@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Pete Resnick
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-extra-imap-objectid-06
> Reviewer: Pete Resnick
> Review Date: 2018-07-27
> IETF LC End Date: 2018-07-13
> IESG Telechat date: 2018-08-02
> 
> Summary: Ready with Nits
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> Thanks for the changes responding to my review. Good work.
> 
> §5.2, ¶6:
> 
> OLD
>   THREADID is optional, if the server doesn't support THREADID or is
> NEW
>   THREADID is OPTIONAL; if the server doesn't support THREADID or is
> 
> §5.2 ¶7:
> 
> Not clear to me why the THREADID and EMAILID can't be the same. I assume given
> the MUST it's going to be some sort of interoperability problem, but it does
> seem odd. But don't change it on my account.
> 
> §8.2 ¶2:
> 
> s/backend object collide/backend object identifiers
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to