Pete, thank you for your reviews of this document. Dino, thank you for addressing Pete’s comment. I have entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On Feb 5, 2019, at 9:43 PM, Pete Resnick <resn...@episteme.net> wrote: > > Reviewer: Pete Resnick > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your > document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-24 > Reviewer: Pete Resnick > Review Date: 2019-02-05 > IETF LC End Date: 2018-08-31 > IESG Telechat date: 2019-02-07 > > Summary: > > The changes made to this version look fine to me. No concerns save the > editorial comment below. > > Major issues: None. > > Minor issues: None. > > Nits/editorial comments: Section 2: Get rid of everything except the last > paragraph. > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
