Paul, thanks for your reviews. Tiru, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On Jan 31, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD > before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see > the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-dots-architecture-16 > Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat > Review Date: 2020-01-31 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-01-31 > IESG Telechat date: 2020-02-04 > > This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be > fixed before publication. > > Thank you for fixing the issues I reported in the last call review. Only one > nit remains. IdNits reports: > > == The document seems to lack the recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate, even if > it appears to use RFC 2119 keywords -- however, there's a paragraph with a > matching beginning. Boilerplate error? (The document does seem to have the > reference to RFC 2119 which the ID-Checklist requires). > > There is one other reported nit (obsolete reference). It is bogus because it > is intended. > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
