Thanks Brian, On Sun, Feb 23, 2020, at 17:01, Brian Carpenter via Datatracker wrote: > Is this draft intended to become part of BCP25? I think it would be > useful for the IESG to clarify this rather than leave it to the RFC Editor.
This is a good question. Given the intended status of BCP, I would say that integrating into 25 is better than creating a new number. I don't know how to best signal this intent though. And I fixed the nit in the copy on GitHub. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
