Thank you Vijay, The resolution of some of the last call comments was to change the intended status to Informational. I don’t see a need to re-issue the review if others do not.
Karen From: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurb...@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 9:48 AM To: Harlan Stenn <st...@nwtime.org> Cc: "gen-art >> General area reviewing team" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds....@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds....@ietf.org>, "last-c...@ietf.org" <last-c...@ietf.org>, "n...@ietf.org" <n...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Ntp] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09 Resent-From: <alias-boun...@ietf.org> Resent-To: <br...@innovationslab.net>, <odonog...@isoc.org>, <dsibold.i...@gmail.com>, <evyn...@cisco.com>, <ek.i...@gmail.com>, Karen O'Donoghue <odonog...@isoc.org> Resent-Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 9:48 AM Ah, I reviewed version 8, which had an intended status of Historic. As I was nearing the end of the document, -09 was released. Instead of reading -09 all over again, I read the diffs between -08 and -09. Looks like the intended status was changed to Informational in -09, and this change, while it showed up in the diff, escaped me since I looked at the changes in the body of the I-D, not the headers. I don't see a need to re-issue a Gen-ART review, unless others do, in which case I am happy to re-issue. Cheers, - vijay On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:52 PM Harlan Stenn <st...@nwtime.org<mailto:st...@nwtime.org>> wrote: I thought we were going for Informational. On 7/6/2020 10:18 AM, Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker wrote: > Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-ntp-mode-6-cmds-09 > Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani > Review Date: 2020-07-06 > IETF LC End Date: 2020-06-15 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: This I-D is ready to be published as a Historical RFC. > > Major issues: 0 > > Minor issues: 0 > > Nits/editorial comments: 0 > > > > _______________________________________________ > ntp mailing list > n...@ietf.org<mailto:n...@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp > -- Harlan Stenn <st...@nwtime.org<mailto:st...@nwtime.org>> http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member!
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
