Meral, thanks for the review. The document does say in the first sentence of the Introduction that the preview is for the end user. I agree that it would be useful to emphasize that, though, and I think the right place to do it is by adding to the first paragraph of Section 3.2 something like the following: “The preview string is meant to help the end-user, and is not intended to be interpreted in any way by the client software.”
Barry On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 4:52 PM Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour > > Review result: Ready with Nits > > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > > like any other last call comments. > > > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > > > Document: draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09 > > Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour > > Review Date: 2020-09-15 > > IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-14 > > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > > > Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I > have > > some comments. > > > > Major issues: > > > > Minor issues: > > > > Nits/editorial comments: In Section 4.2, it would have been good to give > some > > example and advice on when the client uses the preview to take some > action. Is > > this to be avoided? (Was not very clear to me). > > > > Best Regards, > > Meral Shirazipour > > www.ericsson.com > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
