On Wed, Dec 2, 2020, at 02:18, Barry Leiba wrote: > > And yeah - if the latest mmark is causing artifacts I'll see what I can do > > about those. I admit I didn't > > read through the whole thing in detail again after making the last updates. > > If it's easy to fix, please do, but don't get too wrapped up in > spending time on that: the RFC Editor will be converting it to xml2rfc > v3 anyway, and those issues will be resolved in that process.
Thanks Barry, it was really this simple: -For servers which also support [!@RFC8579] delivery to special-use mailboxes, +For servers which also support [@!RFC8579] delivery to special-use mailboxes, Yep, I did feel rather silly. My workflow already spits out xml2rfc v3 files, so hopefully that saves the RFC editor some work :) I've uploaded -06 with those two fixes, since I haven't seen any other feedback yet. Bron. -- Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd br...@fastmailteam.com
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
