Hi Roni, Thanks for your review and your comments. We will re-organize the text in the introduction section as suggested by you for a better flow - this will be posted in the next update.
Regarding the terminology section, we've followed the practice of expanding in-line on first use. Note that this document does not really introduce a new terminology but references and uses them from other documents (with references provided). Thanks, Ketan On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 15:05, Roni Even via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-?? > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date: 2021-11-22 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-11-24 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > The document is ready for publication as a standard track rfc with > editorial > comment. > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > An editorial comment: I suggest that the introduction section will start > with > the description of the protocol. it can use the text from the abstract > with the > text from the last two paragraph of the introspection section that should > move > to the start of the section. The definitions / terminology should follow > or be > in a sub section. > > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
