Hi Christer, Thanks very much for your genart review. We have tried to address your comments in PR #390. https://github.com/lake-wg/edhoc/pull/390
Inline response below. Further comments are welcome. Thanks, Göran From: Christer Holmberg via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> Date: Tuesday, 20 December 2022 at 20:48 To: gen-art@ietf.org <gen-art@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-lake-edhoc....@ietf.org <draft-ietf-lake-edhoc....@ietf.org>, l...@ietf.org <l...@ietf.org>, last-c...@ietf.org <last-c...@ietf.org> Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lake-edhoc-18 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-lake-edhoc-18 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: 2022-12-20 IETF LC End Date: None IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: The document is well written, and easy to read. I do have one minor issue that I would like the authors to address. Major issues: N/A Minor issues: Q1: The document talks about the Initiator and Responder roles, what messages they send etc. But I can't find a definition of what the roles. I assume the Initiator initiates something, but unless I have missed it it would be good to have a few word of role definitions. The Initiator is basically defined by the party sending message_1 and then the messages alternate between Initator and Responder. We added some more text to clarify this. Göran Nits/editorial comments: N/A
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art