Hi Robert, Thank you for the review.
Please see inline. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Robert Sparks via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > Envoyé : vendredi 17 février 2023 21:30 > À : gen-art@ietf.org > Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns....@ietf.org; last- > c...@ietf.org; ops...@ietf.org > Objet : Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-add- > encrypted-dns-09 > > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General > Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being > processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these > comments just like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns-09 > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review Date: 2023-02-17 > IETF LC End Date: 2023-02-23 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: After addressing an issue, this will be ready for > publication as a Proposed Standard RFC > > Issue: draft-ietf-add-dnr needs to be a normative reference, or > some other mechanic needs to be used to ensure draft-ietf-add-dnr > is published as an RFC before IANA follows the instructions in > this document. > [Med] 142/166 are permanent assignments. The IANA registry is authoritative here. Please note that we have the following to make sure that the registry is in sync vs. DHCP and have this note for IANA: The initial content of this sub-registry is listed in Table 4. The Value and Description fields echo those of [DHCPv6]. Changes to the entry in the dhcp options registry will be automatically reflected in the registry defined by this document. > Nit: The discussion in paragraph 3 of section 3 and the note that > follows are currently ambiguous. When it calls out that 2865 > limits the size of DHCP options and that 7499 and 7930 relaxes the > limit, is it only trying to inform where the recommendation of > supporting 65535 bytes came from? Or is it trying to constrain the > size of any DHCP option added to the the attributes defined here > to 4096? > [Med] Alan already clarified this one. Please let us know if any text tweak is needed. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
