> On May 11, 2023, at 3:49 PM, Dale R. Worley <wor...@ariadne.com> wrote:
> 
> Michael Welzl <mich...@ifi.uio.no> writes:
>>> On Apr 13, 2023, at 8:32 PM, Dale Worley via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>> So to fix this, I recommend that the authors go through the text
>>> looking for modal words, [...]
>> 
>> - that seems to be the right way to approach this. It is a very good
>> suggestion, many thanks. Indeed, while the case you quote is covered
>> by the API draft, it would be terrible if we’d miss any other
>> requirement there.
> 
> Fortunately, it sounds like these are all things I would classify as
> wording issues.  But I do apologize for the sheer number of minor
> changes that you'll have to consider.

You really shouldn’t!  What you did is to improve our spec - what more could we 
ask for?  You did put a lot of effort into this, it is us who have to be 
thankful!


>> As a way forward, my plan is to file issues in our github (
>> https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts
>> <https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts> ) for the smaller things
>> below, [..]
> 
> Yes, that's certainly sufficient.  I am just a reviewer, and for minor
> things, I expect nothing more than that the authors consider whether
> some improvement should be made (or not).

Great - many thanks!

Cheers,
Michael

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to