+gen-art. Something in the way the directorate review was done confuses the reply-to-all feature. See also prior reply to the list.
-- Jeff > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: draft-ietf-bfd-secure-sequence-numbers-22 ietf last call Genart > review > Date: August 16, 2025 at 11:25:24 AM EDT > To: "rtg-bfd@ietf. org" <[email protected]> > > Mallory, > > >> On Aug 14, 2025, at 12:22 PM, Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 8/14/25 10:40, Mallory Knodel via Datatracker wrote: >>> It seems that the nomenclature should be somewhat patterned in format >>> everywhere consistently thusly: >> Too many hands on the diff. These are details where the RFC editor is >> capable of normalizing things. But since edits need to happen, some work >> can happen prior to that. > > I reviewed the uses of the various instance of Meticulous Keyed ISAAC. The > majority were appropriate for their usage. I corrected at least one > inconsistency in case and one inappropriate form. > > I'd suggest leaving the remaining items to the RFC editor. > >> Perhaps sections 5 and 6 could be stated as "BFD authentication procedures >> when using XXX formats"? > > This was done. > > -23 covers the addressable items from your review. Thanks. > > -- Jeff
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
