Sue,

Thanks for this review. This is very helpful, and we'll work to incorporate 
these changes.

-andy

On 8/17/26 5:13 PM, Sue Hares via Datatracker wrote:
> Document: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-extensions
> Title: RDAP Extensions
> Reviewer: Sue Hares
> Review result: On the Right Track
> 
> This Early review finds the document is clear and comprehensive, except for 
> the
> points below.
> 
> The text is on the right track. As my familiarity with RDAP and JSON is dated,
> I have 3 suggestions and 1 question .
> 
> 1) Split section 7.2 into pieces similar to :
> 7.2.1 - Registration procedures,
> 7.2.2 - Expert review
> 
> The split will help the expert review process by clearly defining registration
> and expert review separately.
> 
> 2) Section 7.2 paragraph 5, starting with "all registrations SHOULD"
> 
> Do you want to state this as a registration requirement, or as an instruction
> to the expert as "latitude" accepted by this document?  It is rather unclear.
> At the very least, make it clear whether it is a requirement or a suggestion
> for the expert reviewer.
> 
> 3) Multiple experts reviewing the document
> Without at least 2 experts, this may become difficult for IANA to manage.  I
> assume that the
> 
> 4) How does the TLD list get expanded?  I'm a little unclear on this point.  
> Is
> it by expert review, IETF review or something else? Did I miss this or
> misunderstand the text? If I have, just kindly let me know.
> 
> Suggestion:
> It seems like text on redirect and security repeats several time.  Have one of
> the authors look toward reducing the repetition.
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to