Hello Shaun I am not contributing to gendarme or any mono open source project. However, I am a user of gendarme and partcover... From my point of view you do not have to relies on gendarme to calculate complexity. OpenCover could be lighter if you just use Cecil and adapt and extract a code fragment from the AvoidComplexMethodsRules class, removing any dependencies to gendarme. Gendarme is a really great tool, but I do not really see the point to ship it with open cover which purpose is really different. I look forward to see branch coverage in open cover :) Regards
Alex On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Shaun Wilde <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi > > I am looking to add a cyclomatic complexity metric to my coverage reports > from opencover (a .NET code coverage tool hosted on github). I see that > Gendarme calculates a value via it's AvoidComplexMethodsRule which I can > leverage. > > Will anyone object if I link to the gendarme library to calculate this > value for me (I see no reason to reinvent the wheel) so I can concentrate on > branch and method coverage instrumentation. Also the detection of ternary > operator looks interesting where did this come from and is it explained > anywhere, looks like magic code to me that needs documentation support? > > Finally do we have an accuracy of CC or is it just a metric that we can use > as a rule of thumb? > > Shaun > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Gendarme" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Gendarme" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en.
