Hello, I agree.
We have at least one female rolemodel, though, and she's seen by thousands of people thanks to the Ambassadors Programme: http://outreach.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Welcome2WP_English_082310.pdf&page=1 Best wishes, Lennart Lennart Guldbrandsson, Fellow of the Wikimedia Foundation / Wikimedia Foudation-stipendiat Chair of Wikimedia Sverige / ordförande för Wikimedia Sverige http://wikimedia.se Tfn: 031 - 12 50 48 Mobil: 070 - 207 80 05 Epost: l_guldbrands...@hotmail.com Användarsida: http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anv%C3%A4ndare:Hannibal Blogg: http://mrchapel.wordpress.com/ > Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:00:15 +0100 > From: julianadacostaj...@googlemail.com > To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > Subject: [Gendergap] Visible female faces for Wikim/pedia > > Hello, > > my problem in Wikipedia is, that we have not many rolemodels who are > not very known outside of the Wikim/pedia world. The only one, who is > constant in media is Sue. > Sue is wonderful, but where are the other faces of Wikim/pedia? Where > are the other women, why are they hiding? > > Ok, we had a Wikimedia-Clip made last year with some female faces. I > like this clip very much, but there you see more male faces than > female again and for animate women to envolve themselves, it is too > special and for my taste too "Wikim/pedia-exclusive". > > My oppinion is, if we want to win females, we need more visible female > Wikim/pedians. > > Just my 2 cents. > > J. > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap