Hello,

I agree. 

We have at least one female rolemodel, though, and she's seen by thousands of 
people thanks to the Ambassadors Programme:

http://outreach.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Welcome2WP_English_082310.pdf&page=1


Best wishes,

Lennart

Lennart Guldbrandsson, 
Fellow of the Wikimedia Foundation / Wikimedia Foudation-stipendiat
Chair of Wikimedia Sverige / ordförande för Wikimedia Sverige 
http://wikimedia.se
Tfn: 031 - 12 50 48
Mobil: 070 - 207 80 05
Epost: l_guldbrands...@hotmail.com
Användarsida: http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anv%C3%A4ndare:Hannibal
Blogg: http://mrchapel.wordpress.com/




> Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:00:15 +0100
> From: julianadacostaj...@googlemail.com
> To: gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: [Gendergap] Visible female faces for Wikim/pedia
> 
> Hello,
> 
> my problem in Wikipedia is, that we have not many rolemodels who are
> not very known outside of the Wikim/pedia world. The only one, who is
> constant in media is Sue.
> Sue is wonderful, but where are the other faces of Wikim/pedia? Where
> are the other women, why are they hiding?
> 
> Ok, we had a Wikimedia-Clip made last year with some female faces. I
> like this clip very much, but there you see more male faces than
> female again and for animate women to envolve themselves, it is too
> special and for my taste too  "Wikim/pedia-exclusive".
> 
> My oppinion is, if we want to win females, we need more visible female
> Wikim/pedians.
> 
> Just my 2 cents.
> 
> J.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
                                          
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to