hmmm. okay. you can delete that part if you want. this is just a rough draft, and i'm assuming together we can come up with something that is accurate and positive. thanks for pointing that out pete.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Pete Forsyth <petefors...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 24, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Sandra ordonez wrote: > > > What language can we include so that we feel safe about sharing personal > stories here, or opinions? > > Hi Sandy and all, > > I love the Manifesto, and hope it will continue to evolve. > > I have a sort of general concern though, about the way we think and talk > about "safety." I should say up front, I don't have a solution in mind -- > but I think it's important to think this through carefully. > > Of course we want to establish a safe space, but I think we have a > responsibility not to talk about safety in terms that go beyond what we can > reasonably provide. And our list which is publicly archived. Even if we are > diligent about dealing with bad faith *participation* on the list, we have > absolutely no ability to exclude anyone from reading the list, or linking to > or commenting on it elsewhere on the Internet. > > As it stands right now (with open sign-up and public list archives), I > don't feel great about putting emphasis on encouraging people to voice > frustrations or, more generally, to feel safe. It doesn't seem responsible. > > -Pete > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > -- Sandra Ordonez Web Astronaut "Helping you rock out in the virtual world." *www.collaborativenation.com*
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
