I think it works both ways: There you might get stomped on by people who disagree with the lies Sue told in the post, and here I will be stomp up for even mentioned that she did lied in that blog post.
Safe environment do not exist in this case. Is safeR for supports to come here, and safeR for opposers to go there. That does not make any list safe, only shows that the POV here is different than the POV there. _____ *Béria Lima* Wikimedia Portugal <http://wikimedia.pt> (351) 963 953 042 *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer.* On 30 September 2011 00:25, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stie...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm sure there are some people on this mailing list who also disagree as > well! We try to provide a safe haven for discussion about sensitive topics. > > But, if any of us spoke up on Foundation-L we'd be risking getting torn up > by often heavily opinionated Foundation-L subscribers, and it gets really > tiring :( It is also nice to have a change in opinion - for those who > dislike the post, there are also many of that support it. Thanks for > bringing up that a different type of conversation is taking place on > Foundation-L! I've been following it. > > -Sarah > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Béria Lima <beria.l...@wikimedia.pt>wrote: > >> ehhh, sorry for be the different, but you people are reading the thread >> about that same blog post in Foundation-l ? The opinions there seems to be >> quite different than yours. >> _____ >> *Béria Lima* >> Wikimedia Portugal <http://wikimedia.pt> >> (351) 963 953 042 >> >> *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter >> livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que >> estamos a fazer.* >> >> >> >> On 30 September 2011 00:09, Ryan Kaldari <rkald...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> >>> ** >>> Can I nominate Sue for the Executive Director's Barnstar? :) >>> >>> Kaldari >>> >>> >>> On 9/29/11 4:06 PM, Amory wrote: >>> >>> I normally hate +1s, but I would like to echo this. Really exceptionally >>> well crafted, and even for people following it's a very good writeup. Thank >>> you, Sue. >>> >>> ~A >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:36, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for the link Sarah. It's an outstanding post by Sue, and a >>>> courageous one, too. >>>> >>>> Andreas >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --- On *Thu, 29/9/11, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stie...@gmail.com>* wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Sarah Stierch <sarah.stie...@gmail.com> >>>> Subject: [Gendergap] Sue's new blog >>>> To: "Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects" < >>>> gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org> >>>> Date: Thursday, 29 September, 2011, 7:47 >>>> >>>> >>>> http://suegardner.org/2011/09/28/on-editorial-judgment-and-empathy/ >>>> >>>> >>>> A lot of things I think about, and I'm sure a lot of other people here >>>> think about. >>>> >>>> I'm sure this blog won't be well received on other WMF-related mailing >>>> lists, but, I have to admit - for me - I feel like she's speaking for me. >>>> >>>> I don't want to be a censor, I just want people to have common sense, >>>> good judgement, customer service and logic. And when people call *me* a >>>> censor, it's just as offensive as the other names I've been called. >>>> >>>> I have beencalled a prude, bitch, agitator, bore, conservative, censor, >>>> "anti-woman"... someone with an agenda...etc. I can only thank you Sue for >>>> speaking on behalf of me - when I clumsily try to express myself on >>>> Foundation-L and fear being shot-down and having my "Wiki" self-esteem torn >>>> down.....I just feel like "giving up." >>>> >>>> Thanks. And I promise everyone, some of us are working towards this, and >>>> working towards a change and a towards a conversation that is adult, >>>> logical >>>> and respectful. >>>> >>>> <3 >>>> >>>> -Sarah >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia <http://www.glamwiki.org> >>>> Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American >>>> Art<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch> >>>> and >>>> Sarah Stierch Consulting >>>> *Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.* >>>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>>> http://www.sarahstierch.com/ >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Inline Attachment Follows----- >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Gendergap mailing list >>>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org<http://mc/compose?to=Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org> >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Gendergap mailing list >>>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gendergap mailing >>> listGendergap@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gendergap mailing list >>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gendergap mailing list >> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> >> > > > -- > GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia <http://www.glamwiki.org> > Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American > Art<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch> > and > Sarah Stierch Consulting > *Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.* > ------------------------------------------------------ > http://www.sarahstierch.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
