I see that the user uploaded quite a few images on the same date, which are
similar in their quality:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/%E8%99%8D

They are taken from a variety of websites, several from the same Megnin
one; some are probably legitimate but others not so much. From the sample I
looked at, none were in actual use. Many are in this category:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Lehnert_%26_Landrock

Thanks for looking into it, Beria.

Risker/Anne

On 25 March 2012 23:06, Béria Lima <beria.l...@wikimedia.pt> wrote:

> 03:01, 26 March 2012 Beria <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Beria>
> (talk <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Beria> | 
> contribs<http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Beria>
> ) deleted page File:739 - Type 
> d'Orient.jpg<http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:739_-_Type_d%27Orient.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1>
> (Copyright violation <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:L>:
> copyright © Michel Mégnin, 2002 - 2010)
>
> I think that solves the problem, no?
>
> Risker, if there are more images from this site on commons, please let me
> know
> _____
> *Béria Lima*
>
> *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
> livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a
> construir esse sonho. <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>*
>
>
>
> On 25 March 2012 20:46, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Of note, I question the copyright status of this (and other) images.  In
>> particular, there's no evidence at all that the photo was taken in the
>> 1910s, and there is the fact that the copyright and appropriateness of
>> these images is already in question when one looks at the website referred
>> to as the source of the image.
>>
>> Of course, I don't go near Commons if I can avoid it - and I usually can
>> - so I'm not going to take up this fight.  However, if *I* can see a
>> problem with an image copyright, there's probably a problem.
>>
>> Risker/Anne
>>
>> (And thanks to Andreas and whomever else removed the images from other
>> projects.)
>>
>> On 25 March 2012 09:38, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This edit to the article on the niqab worn by Muslim women
>>>
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Niq%C4%81b&diff=482813756&oldid=481659451
>>>
>>> was pointed out on the Wikipediocracy forum the other day (
>>> http://www.wikipediocracy.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=122; I'm a mod
>>> there).
>>>
>>> The edit has stood for five days now. The same image was also inserted
>>> in a bunch of other Wikipedias (and may still be present in them).
>>>
>>> Interestingly, in the German Wikipedia, it was stopped by the pending
>>> changes function. (I've reverted it in the German Wikipedia.)
>>>
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gendergap mailing list
>>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to