The best way for you to help the goals of this list is for you to leave it.
On 12 Dec 2014 19:04, "Reguyla" <regu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure how I became the bad guy here just because I think there is a
> problem with civility and bias that needs to be addressed on Wikipedia.
> Personally Chris, I don't think your comments directed at me are
> particularly helpful to the goals of this list either. I wasn't the one
> that voted 2 women out of the project and left a man that has a years long
> history of abuse and multiple trips to the Arbcom on the site (and BTW I
> say that as someone who isn't the least bit bothered by Eric). That was
> Arbcom. But if you think that I somehow have negatively influenced anything
> by participating in this list, then please explain that to me. Because I
> for one would like to see Wikipedia change to be more inviting to all
> editors, and treat all editors fairly, unlike the current status of things
> on the project now.
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Chris Keating <chriskeatingw...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>>
>> This is also part of the problem - we have "helpful" contributions from
>> people like Reguyla / Kumioko who is basically here to complain about how
>> awful Arbcom are. Some months ago he was engaged in a campaign of personal
>> abuse against arbitrators which to be frank is exactly the kind of thing
>> that drives people away from those positions.
>> On 12 Dec 2014 17:38, "regu...@gmail.com" <regu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Its not surprising that the arbcom would not like comments and be
>>> critical of a venue they do not control and cannot themselves silence
>>> critical comments about their decisions. I finf it unfortunate that an arb
>>> doesnt want to join the mailing list merely because some people here do not
>>> share the view that the arbcoms decisions are not all gold.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I do agree that there were some comments that are off topic but thats
>>> true of all the lists, not just this one.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In the end, to me, if the arbs decide not to join this list because they
>>> fear discussion, then we probably dont need them anyway and if they are
>>> unwilling to listen or discuss issues pertaining to the project, including
>>> poor decisions made by them, then that makes my thought process all the
>>> more true.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE device
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------ Original message------
>>>
>>> *From: *Carol Moore dc
>>>
>>> *Date: *Fri, Dec 12, 2014 11:20 AM
>>>
>>> *To: *Increasing female participation in Wikimedia projects;
>>>
>>> *Subject:*[Gendergap] Gender gap emails Arbitrator doesn't like
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&diff=637703278&oldid=637701678
>>> Is a comment by an Arbitrator about things written last month or so
>>> here, none by me, they don't like.
>>>
>>> Thinks it's necessary "the moderators get a grip on some of the things
>>> being said there." (Moderator comments welcome here for guidance.)
>>>
>>> *https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2014-November/004930.html
>>>
>>> "a posting about legal repercussions"
>>>
>>> *https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2014-December/005008.html
>>>
>>> "suggesting doxxing/opposition research"
>>>
>>> *
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2014-December/005068.html
>>> "plans" to
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2014-December/005079.html
>>> "block vote at ArbCom elections with new editors recruited at editathons."
>>>  (actually just a suggestion by an annoyed editor)
>>>
>>> Hopefully they aren't proposing a standard tougher than than on all the
>>> other mailing lists, none of which I personally belong to.
>>>
>>> CM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gendergap mailing list
>>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to