Hi John Thank you very much for your answer, at least I can get a way with it now, by stating that "digest" is misleading :D. So you definitely recommend non-digest? well, all understood, I'm off to try it. As long I don't miss nothing ;) >From what you saying, I'll be getting each topic in a different email!, is this correct?
Thanks in advance Salam << Peace :-) A.Haq Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:19:30 -0500 > From: "Boncek, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: nadim's concern! (Khaled Hosny) > To: "General Arabization Discussion" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > As a native speaker of English, I can confidently tell you that "digest" > means a condensed version of something else, usually multiple items > packaged together. In this case, the use of the term may be a little > misleading -- I doubt there is any condensing. It's probably just an > all-in-one mailing of messages that would be sent separately otherwise. I > haven't subscribed to your digest, but that's what some other mailing > lists do. To be sure of getting everything, don't use the digest option. > >
_______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/general
