On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Henk P. Penning <penn...@uu.nl> wrote:

> On Sat, 24 May 2014, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>  Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 06:50:15 +0200
>> From: Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org>
>> To: general@attic.apache.org
>> Subject: Dropping the HEADER change
>> Sender: hyand...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>> Currently the Attic process suggests modifying the
>> dist.apache.orgHEADER.html for a project. Then later, the directory is
>>
>> deleted.
>>
>> I'd like to flatten that and go straight to deleting the directory. I
>> don't
>> think there is any value in maintaining the directory for a period of time
>> and it simplifies the process for moving something into the Attic.
>>
>> Any -1s?
>>
>
> Hi Hen,
>
>   +1 ; but I hope you want to keep process[3].2 :
>
>     strip dist/project and add a .htaccess containing :
>     RedirectMatch permanent .* http://attic.apache.org/
> projects/${project}.html
>
>   that is, move process[3].2 to process[2].
>

Why not a redirect to the archive.apache.org url for the project?


>
>   I can take care of it ; are attic commit rights sufficient?
>
>
Joe said it would need svnadmin access currently. My aim is to avoid my
mistake of a few years back in which Attic JIRA issues required >
Attic+member karma. So I'm expecting to put it in the Infra ticket, but no
reason why you couldn't handle it there :)


>   Re: process[3].1 "delete the user list (unless still active)" ;
>   I wonder if that can also move to process[2].
>

Good idea. It's rare that we see active user mailing lists, if we have, so
I'm +1 to that being in the Infra-please-close ticket. We can apply a dose
of common sense if a list is still active.

Hen

Reply via email to