On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Henk P. Penning <penn...@uu.nl> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 May 2014, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 06:50:15 +0200 >> From: Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> >> To: general@attic.apache.org >> Subject: Dropping the HEADER change >> Sender: hyand...@gmail.com >> >> >> Currently the Attic process suggests modifying the >> dist.apache.orgHEADER.html for a project. Then later, the directory is >> >> deleted. >> >> I'd like to flatten that and go straight to deleting the directory. I >> don't >> think there is any value in maintaining the directory for a period of time >> and it simplifies the process for moving something into the Attic. >> >> Any -1s? >> > > Hi Hen, > > +1 ; but I hope you want to keep process[3].2 : > > strip dist/project and add a .htaccess containing : > RedirectMatch permanent .* http://attic.apache.org/ > projects/${project}.html > > that is, move process[3].2 to process[2]. > Why not a redirect to the archive.apache.org url for the project? > > I can take care of it ; are attic commit rights sufficient? > > Joe said it would need svnadmin access currently. My aim is to avoid my mistake of a few years back in which Attic JIRA issues required > Attic+member karma. So I'm expecting to put it in the Infra ticket, but no reason why you couldn't handle it there :) > Re: process[3].1 "delete the user list (unless still active)" ; > I wonder if that can also move to process[2]. > Good idea. It's rare that we see active user mailing lists, if we have, so I'm +1 to that being in the Infra-please-close ticket. We can apply a dose of common sense if a list is still active. Hen