Isn’t it a bit premature to change the process ? Seen from pow we are experimenting with at least 3 proposals of which 1 does not need a buildbot.
This is of course just my opinion. rgds jan I Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2018, at 12:33, hbout...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: hboutemy > Date: Sat Apr 28 10:33:07 2018 > New Revision: 1830424 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1830424&view=rev > Log: > added links to Buildbot job and svnwcsub configuration > > Modified: > attic/site/xdocs/process.xml > > Modified: attic/site/xdocs/process.xml > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/attic/site/xdocs/process.xml?rev=1830424&r1=1830423&r2=1830424&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- attic/site/xdocs/process.xml (original) > +++ attic/site/xdocs/process.xml Sat Apr 28 10:33:07 2018 > @@ -76,8 +76,9 @@ > > <p>The following are usefull svn/https locations: > <ul> > - <li>svn site <a > href="http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/attic";>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/attic</a></li> > + <li>svn site <a > href="http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/attic";>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/attic</a>: > sources in <code>xdocs</code>, generated html in <code>docs</code></li> > <li>site <a > href="http://attic.apache.org";>http://attic.apache.org</a></li> > + <li>internals: <a > href="https://ci.apache.org/builders/attic-site";>Buildbot job</a> to build > from source and commit generated html, <a > href="https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/blob/deployment/modules/svnwcsub/files/svnwcsub.conf#L36";>svnwcsub > configuration</a> to update generated html from svn to webserver</li> > <li>jira <a > href="https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC";>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC</a></li> > <li>committees.xml <a > href="https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/projects.apache.org/data/committees.xml";>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/projects.apache.org/data/committees.xml</a></li> > </ul> > >
