Why would AOL go to the trouble of making an entire operating system?  All
they would have to do is to make their own Windows 'shell' program and
have it replace Explorer with itself.   (Anyone here remember Microsoft
Bob?).    AOL users don't need an entire operating system for AOL
integration, all they need is a small Windows program that provides a
space for them to store their icons... It could even put its skin over all
Windows applications to give the computer that 'AOL feel'.

I think the average AOLer has just enough intelligence to find setup.exe
in case the AutoRun doesn't work... But I may be too generous here...
There is no way in hell they would ever survive Linux, no matter how user
friendly it became.   Heck, Windows stupifies many people! (I have even
heard people complain that Macintoshes are HARD to use!)


Unless AOL is plannning to use its special version of Linux in some kind
of embedded computer or applicance (kinda like those souped up phones that
do email).  Then a customized version of linux would be approriate in a
situation where a customer never even knows what it is....

With all of the advancements, there will occasionnally to be the need to
dip into the command prompt in linux,  just as in Windows, it is sometimes
required to exit the registry or run diagnostics from a 'system disk'.

Operating systems will *NEVER* be 100% foolproof. There will always be
people that find ways to screw them up, there will always be people that
open attachments titled "ME_NUDE.EXE"  without thinking....

-Alex


================================================
BRLUG - The Baton Rouge Linux User Group
Visit http://www.brlug.net for more information.
Send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to change
your subscription information.
================================================

Reply via email to