At 02:15 PM 7/4/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>>Your comment about software companies making money by "implementing it 
>>for people" brings up a good point. I don't think that a model based on 
>>developers doing nothing but contract work is going to work, either for 
>>them or the consumer.
>>Let's say I am a potential client and I need some software. A word 
>>processor would be a good example of this. So I get an open source 
>>developer and contract them to build the software. Under this model the 
>>client bears the entire cost of the development because the cost cannot 
>>be spread across other clients (this is how mass-market commercial 
>>software works).
>>How do we make this kind of model affordable to the client?
>
>If there is a mass market for the software, it will be open sourced. e.g. 
>word processor look at Open Office, KOffice, Abiword, Hancom Office etc

Why? Let's say a large group of consumers want a certain kind of software. 
There is no guarantee that a skilled programmer or group of programmers 
will decide to implement that software just because they want to. In this 
case someone somewhere will need to contract out to a programmer to develop 
the software. If the software has a large potential market then it would be 
better economically to spread that cost out.

How can we do that?

>If the software is singular to certain profitable markets, it might not be 
>open sourced. e.g. point of sale, legal document production system 
>integrated with document management system, etc
>
>If an open source programmer doesn't have a need for it why would he 
>create the program OR if he thinks he can make money from it, why would he 
>open source it?? I know we want to be idealist here, but reality sets in 
>at the profit line. We are all human. Look at the open source antivirus 
>programs available: Clam. Why so little? Open source programmers don't 
>have much need for it AND if they produce it they can make money off it 
>(e.g. RAV). There are only so many M$ haters and/or Linonuts out there who 
>are willing to create open source software into a profitable market.

Don't misinterpret my argument. I am not arguing for or against closed or 
open source. I am simply asking a question based on Will's remarks. :)


---
Dustin Puryear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Puryear Information Technology <http://www.puryear-it.com>
Providing expertise in the management, integration, and
security of Windows and UNIX systems, networks, and applications.


Reply via email to